ArticleScientific reports2025
Apnea detection using wrist actigraphy in patients with heterogeneous sleep disorders.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and related hypoxia are well-established cardiovascular and neurocognitive risk factors. Current multi-sensor diagnostic approaches are intrusive and prone to misdiagnosis when simplified. This study introduces an enhanced single-sensor-based OSA screening method, leveraging novel signal processing and machine learning to ensure accurate detection across diverse populations. Wrist actigraphy is a widely-used and energy-efficient tool for respiratory rate estimation. The main challenge in OSA pattern recognition is handling various disturbances in real-world applications. We developed a novel approach combining apex-centric tokenization with a Multi-Head Causal Attention (MHCA) mechanism. Apex-centric tokenization enhances sensitivity to OSA events, while MHCA refines predictions and increases specificity in detecting oxygen desaturation. Our study involved 58 participants, with overnight bilateral wrist actigraphy and concurrent polysomnography used as a reference for thorough analysis. By focusing on the physiological causal relationship of the events, the algorithm excelled in detecting moderate to severe oxygen desaturation, achieving a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 98.1%, even in the presence of disturbances such as restless leg movements and snoring. The estimated oxygen desaturation index correlated strongly with clinical standards (r = 0.89), and the correlation with the apnea-hypopnea index was 0.87. Both apex-centric tokenization and MHCA were crucial for this performance. Our approach shows potential for analyzing apnea patterns and related oxygen desaturation in a broader population using only wrist actigraphy, reducing measurement burdens and improving understanding of complex sleep disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.