Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40404647›Full record

ReviewNPJ science of food2025

AI for food: accelerating and democratizing discovery and innovation.

Ellen Kuhl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ science of food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The meatball matchup: Plant vs. animal proteins on campus.Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Probiotics and Fermented Foods in Human Nutrition.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Predicting food taste with bound-driven optimization.Current research in food science · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ellen KuhlDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. ekuhl@stanford.edu.

Funding

Food System Innovations Seed GrantHORIZON EUROPE European Research Council Advanced Grant 101141626National Science Foundation, United States CMMI 2320933Stanford Plant-Based Diet Initiative Seed Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By 2050, feeding nearly 10 billion people will require transformative changes to ensure nutritious, sustainable food for all. Our current food system is inefficient and unsustainable. Traditional attempts to transform the global food system are too slow to drive innovation at scale. Here we explore the potential of artificial intelligence to reshape the future of food. We review the state of the art in food development, discuss the data needed to define a new food product, and highlight seven challenges where AI can help us design nutritious, delicious, and sustainable foods for all. By leveraging AI to democratize food innovation, we can accelerate the transition to resilient global food systems that meet the urgent challenges of food security, climate change, and planetary health.

Identifiers

PMID40404647
PMCPMC12098880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.