ArticleNature communications2025
Imputing single-cell protein abundance in multiplex tissue imaging.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spotlight on challenges and novel methods in highly multiplexed tissue imaging-based spatial proteomics.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Extensible Immunofluorescence (ExIF) accessibly generates high-plexity datasets by integrating standard 4-plex imaging data.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiplex tissue imaging enables single-cell spatial proteomics and transcriptomics but remains limited by incomplete molecular profiling, tissue loss, and probe failure. Here, we apply machine learning to impute single-cell protein abundance using multiplex tissue imaging data from a breast cancer cohort. We evaluate regularized linear regression, gradient-boosted trees, and deep learning autoencoders, incorporating spatial context to enhance imputation accuracy. Our models achieve mean absolute errors between 0.05-0.3 on a [0,1] scale, closely approximating ground truth values. Using imputed data, we classify single cells as pre- or post-treatment, demonstrating their biological relevance. These findings establish the feasibility of imputing missing protein abundance, highlight the advantages of spatial information, and support machine learning as a powerful tool for improving single-cell tissue imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.