Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40404589›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2025

Challenges and outcomes of pancreato-duodenectomy in portal annular pancreas: A single center experience with a systematic review of the literature.

Shreeyash Modak, Raviraj Tilloo, Zeeshan Ahmed, Monish Karunakaran, Sanjeev Patil, Mahesh Shetty, Rohit Dama, Pradeep Rebala, Guduru Venkat Rao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shreeyash ModakDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology and AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2838-7628
Raviraj TillooDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology and AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9412-2695
Zeeshan AhmedDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology and AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4009-8730
Monish KarunakaranDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology and AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6144-185X
Sanjeev PatilDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology and AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1643-284X
Mahesh ShettyDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology and AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7173-6984
Rohit DamaDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology and AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9164-3276
Pradeep RebalaDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology and AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-1216
Guduru Venkat RaoDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology and AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2104-7188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims: Portal annular pancreas (PAP) is an anomaly where pancreatic tissue surrounds the portal vein (PV). We present a case series from our institution and a systematic review of PAP patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patient records from a tertiary referral center, from January 2014 to June 2024, who underwent PD to identify those with PAP. Additionally, a literature search was performed and articles discussing PAP patients who underwent PD were included. Results: The incidence of PAP was 0.4% (7 out of 1,750 PD cases). Of these, three (42.85%) patients developed clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). Following the literature review, 34 articles with 57 patients (including our study) were considered. Reconstruction of the dominant stump, which included the main pancreatic duct, was performed using pancreatojejunostomy in 88.88% of cases and pancreatogastrostomy in 11.11% of cases. The non-dominant stump was managed with en-bloc extended resection (ER) of PAP, leftward of the PV, offering a single-cut surface for pancreatojejunostomy (41.51%), by stapling (26.41%) or suturing the stump (16.98%), stump-pancreatogastrostomy (5.66%), and electrocautery (5.66%). CR-POPF rates for ER, suturing and stapling were 22.72%, 37.5%, and 53.85%, respectively ( Conclusions: Preoperative recognition of PAP is crucial to customize surgical procedures to effectively manage the non-dominant stump.

Indexed as

Circumportal pancreasPancreatoduodenectomyPortal annular pancreasPostoperative pancreatic fistula

Identifiers

PMID40404589
PMCPMC12377996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.