ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2026
Depression in older surgical patients: a multicentre prospective longitudinal study.
Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The association between preoperative telomere length and acute postoperative depression: a single-center prospective observational pilot study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Observational
- Long-term risk of depression after sevoflurane versus propofol anesthesia: a global propensity score-matched cohort study.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Observational
- Anxiety and depression in non-cardiac surgical patients and associations with adverse outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA longitudinal examination of postoperative depression is important for risk assessment. We aimed to explore the prevalence and trajectory of depression in older surgical patients, before surgery, and at 30, 90, and 180 days after surgery, associated risk factors, and clinical outcomes.
methodsThis prospective cohort study assessed 307 male and female surgical patients aged ≥65 yr in two preoperative clinics in Canada. All participants completed an online survey before and after surgery that contained the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale with a ≥5 cut-off to define depression. We also assessed risk factors and clinical and patient-centred outcomes associated with depression.
resultsPreoperative depression was present in 20.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.1-25.1) of participants and 17.6% had potentially unrecognised depression. Overall, 18.7% (95% CI: 14.1-24.3) reported depression at 180 days after surgery. Participants with preoperative cognitive impairment (odds ratio [OR]: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.29-6.61, P=0.010) and sleep disturbances (OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.29-7.07, P=0.013) each had three-fold higher odds of preoperative depression. Those with preoperative functional disability had four-fold higher odds of preoperative depression (OR: 4.15, 95% CI: 1.58-11.54, P=0.005) and six-fold higher odds of depression at 180 days after surgery (OR: 5.91, 95% CI: 1.43-29.07, P=0.019). The depression group had 2.5-fold higher odds for non-home discharge (OR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.08-5.10, P=0.026).
conclusionsThe prevalence of depression was 20.2% before surgery and 18.7% at 180 days after surgery. Our findings highlight the interconnectedness of mental health with factors such as function, cognition, and sleep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.