Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40404387›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry investigation2025

Brain Activation in Response to Literature-Related Activities.

Seungpil Jeong, Ji Sun Hong, Doug Hyun Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seungpil JeongDepartment of Psychiatry, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Sun HongDepartment of Psychiatry, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Doug Hyun HanDepartment of Psychiatry, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development InstituteMinistry of Health and Welfare HI22C0775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA humanities-based approach to understanding the brain can yield valuable insights, advancing neuroscience and enhancing mental, emotional, and social well-being. This study was aimed at exploring how engagement in literature-related activities stimulates brain activity in the prefrontal cortex.

methodsWe recruited 24 healthy male participants aged 20 to 29 years. They completed clinical scales assessing depression, anxiety, attention, and humanistic knowledge. They also performed six tasks comprising various literature-related cognitive challenges while hemodynamic changes in their frontal cortices were measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

resultsTask 1 (word memory and recognition) increased activation in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), as did Task 2 (emotional words classification), which also elevated activity in the left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Task 3 (understanding context) increased activation in the dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC). Tasks 4 (interpersonal relationship) and 5 (listening, memory, understanding, and expression) drove similar increases in the frontopolar and DLPFC regions. Task 6 (creative activities using characters and items) significantly activated multiple regions, including the right and left VLPFC and OFC. Humanistic knowledge scores were positively correlated with left and right DLPFC activation in Tasks 3 and 5, respectively. Conversely, Task 6 showed negative correlations between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder scores and both right DLPFC and right OFC activation.

conclusionThis study identified key brain regions involved in literature activities. Complex activities (semantic processing, understanding and creative expression, decision-making and emotional regulation, etc.) stimulated various regions of prefrontal cortices, including the VLPFC, DLPFC, and OFC.

Indexed as

CognitionFunctional near-infrared spectroscopyHumanitiesLiteraturePrefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID40404387
PMCPMC12104757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.