ArticlePsychiatry investigation2025
Psychological Autopsy in Adolescent Suicide: Evaluating Risk Factors and Research Methods.
Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychiatric diagnosis on the edge: is there evidence of benefit?European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe primary purpose of this literature review is to explore and integrate findings from various psychological autopsy (PA) studies to identify critical risk factors associated with adolescent suicide and evaluate the methodologies employed in these investigations.
methodsA systematic review of 15 studies reporting psychological autopsies of adolescent suicides was conducted. Data sources included databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and RISS. Studies were selected based on empirical research focused on adolescent suicides, conducted since 1970, and written in English. Two reviewers independently screened and selected studies, with a third reviewer resolving any disagreements. The studies were analyzed for sample characteristics, included variables, and specific features of the PA methodology.
resultsThe review identified consistent findings across studies, highlighting the significant role of mental illnesses and sociodemographic factors in adolescent suicides. Methodological variations were noted in interview timing, source selection, and the use of semi-structured interviews. The review also emphasized the importance of comprehensive data collection, including social network and mobile activity data, to better understand suicide risk factors. Key challenges identified include retrospective data bias and cultural differences affecting the generalizability of findings.
conclusionThe review underscores the need for standardized PA procedures, particularly tailored to adolescents, to improve the reliability and validity of findings. The consistent association of psychiatric disorders with suicide risk emphasizes the urgent need for effective mental health interventions. Future research should focus on developing ethical, culturally sensitive, and methodologically rigorous approaches to enhance the understanding and prevention of adolescent suicide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.