Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40404353›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Attention Alters Population Spatial Frequency Tuning.

Luis D Ramirez, Feiyi Wang, Sam Ling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Attentional Modulation of Spatial Frequency Tuning: Links to Global-Local Processing and Potential Remediation of Frequency Biases.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Spatial Frequency Tuning Follows Scale Invariance in the Human Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. The Population Spatial Frequency Toolbox.Journal of open research software · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luis D RamirezDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215 lur003@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4105-0496
Feiyi WangDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215.
Sam LingDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215.

Funding

How Does Normalization Regulate Visual Competition?R01EY028163 · NEI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SAM LING · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
What Mechanisms Underlie Top-Down Modulation of Human Visual Cortex?K00EY036804 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Luis Daniel Ramirez · 2024 to 2026
$255k
What Mechanisms Underlie Top-Down Modulation of Human Visual Cortex?F99NS124144 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI RAMIREZ, LUIS DANIEL · 2021 to 2022
$95k
NEI NIH HHS K00 EY036804NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028163NINDS NIH HHS F99 NS124144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial frequency (SF) selectivity serves as a fundamental building block within the visual system, determining what we can and cannot see. Attention is theorized to augment the visibility of items in our environment by changing how we process SFs. However, the specific neural mechanisms underlying this effect remain unclear, particularly in humans. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure voxel-wise population SF tuning (pSFT), which allowed us to examine how attention alters the SF response profiles of neural populations in the early visual cortex (V1-V3). In the scanner, participants (five female, three male) were cued to covertly attend to one of two spatially competing letter streams, each defined by low or high SF content. This task promoted feature-based attention directed to a particular SF, as well as the suppression of the irrelevant stream's SF. Concurrently, we measured pSFT in a task-irrelevant hemifield to examine how the known spatial spread of feature-based attention influenced the SF tuning properties of neurons sampled within a voxel. We discovered that attention elicited attractive shifts in SF preference, toward the attended SF. This suggests that attention can profoundly influence populations of SF preference across the visual field, depending on task goals and native neural preferences.

Indexed as

AttentionSpace PerceptionVisual CortexAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationVisual FieldsYoung AdultattentionfMRIpopulation tuningspatial frequency

Identifiers

PMID40404353
PMCPMC12178278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.