Trial reportHeart (British Cardiac Society)2025
Pulmonary haemodynamics and right heart function during exercise at high versus low altitude in patients with pulmonary vascular disease: a randomised crossover trial.
Trial report in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05107700 (The Impact of Hypoxia on Patients With Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension and Treatment of Adverse Effects), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Impact of Hypoxia on Patients With Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension and Treatment of Adverse Effects
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Iron Homeostasis at High Altitude in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- Nocturnal Cerebral Oxygenation in Low-Altitude Residents With Pulmonary Vascular Disease Staying Overnight at High Altitude. Data From a Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- The effect of high altitude on exercise capacity and cardiorespiratory function in patients with pulmonary vascular disease after an overnight stay at 2500 m: a randomised crossover study.ERJ open research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (PAH/CTEPH) may experience physiological stress at high altitude. We investigated pulmonary haemodynamics and right heart function during incremental (IET) and constant work-rate exercise tests (CWRET) at high (2500 m) vs low altitude (470 m).
methodsIn this randomised crossover trial, patients with stable PAH/CTEPH without resting hypoxaemia performed IET and CWRET at both altitudes. Systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) and right ventricular (RV) arterial coupling (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/sPAP) were assessed by echocardiography.
resultsAmong 27 patients (44% women, 61±14 years), sPAP was higher at rest at 2500 m vs 470 m (mean difference: 14 mm Hg, 95% CI 7 to 23), but increased linearly during exercise with similar slopes at each altitude (7.9 vs 9.7 mm Hg/min, respectively). RV arterial coupling was lower at high altitude at rest (difference: -0.13 mm/mm Hg, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.04) but decreased comparably during exercise. During CWRET, sPAP rose steeply in the first 3 min, plateauing thereafter, with no altitude-dependent differences in pressure-flow slope. Oxygen delivery was reduced at high altitude.
conclusionDespite higher baseline sPAP and reduced RV coupling at rest, exercise-induced haemodynamic changes were similar at both high and low altitudes, suggesting short-term altitude exposure does not exacerbate cardiopulmonary stress during exercise in stable PAH/CTEPH. The exercise protocol (IET vs CWRET) alters haemodynamic trajectories more than altitude. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05107700.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.