ReviewSeminars in perinatology2025
Medication decision making under uncertainty: Considering chronic disease and pregnancy potential.
Review in Seminars in perinatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Building a Framework for Sexual and Reproductive Health Care in the Rheumatology Context: Content and Approaches.Arthritis care & research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People with chronic illness who are (or could become) pregnant and their clinicians may face difficult decisions about the use of medications that can affect fetal health and development. In these situations, people must make the choice whether to use a drug with limited information about teratogenicity to treat their illness, putting an existing or potential pregnancy at risk. This manuscript serves as a call to action for all clinicians whose patients face such treatment choices regarding teratogenic medications or medications with unknown fetal safety. It offers an approach to guiding patient-provider conversations on medication management for individuals who are or might become pregnant, grounded in a review of the existing literature on medication decision making for drugs with known or potential teratogenic properties and informed by the current tools available for offering decision support. As a case study for highlighting current challenges and potential solutions around safe prescribing, we focus on two systemic autoimmune and rheumatic diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis, which disproportionately affect females compared to males (with incidence ratios of 9:1 and 3:1, respectively). We address how recent reproductive policy changes that restrict abortion access may affect both a provider and a patient's decision calculus. Finally, we highlight several gaps that could be addressed by future research and the implementation of new data collection practices by federal bodies, while offering an approach to optimize patient-provider communication under conditions of ongoing uncertainty around the safety of drugs for those who may become pregnant while using them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.