Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40404047›Full record

ReviewChest2025

Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism During Pregnancy.

Meriem Hammache, Camille Simard, Sandrine Hamel, Suzie Ouellet, Gisèle Jolicoeur, Karen Wou, Kate Sellen, Ramy El-Jalbout, Jayson Potts, Ghada Bourjeily and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chest, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Meriem HammacheFaculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Camille SimardDepartment of Medicine, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sandrine HamelDepartment of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Suzie OuelletDepartment of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Gisèle JolicoeurDepartment of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Karen WouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Kate SellenHealth Design Studio, OCAD University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ramy El-JalboutDepartment of Medical Imaging and Azrielli Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jayson PottsDepartment of Medicine, Vancouver Island Health Authority, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ghada BourjeilyDepartment of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Maral KoolianDepartment of Medicine, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Vicky TagalakisDepartment of Medicine, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Leslie SkeithDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Grégoire Le GalDepartment of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Isabelle MalhaméCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: Isabelle.malhame@mcgill.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

topic importancePulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the leading causes of pregnancy-related deaths in high-income countries. Maternal mortality from PE has been attributed to delayed recognition and investigation. The diagnosis of PE may be challenging, as its early signs and symptoms may overlap with physiological changes of pregnancy. As such, promptly ruling out suspected PE using diagnostic testing is of paramount importance. This narrative review provides a contemporary overview of risk assessment tools, diagnostic modalities, counseling needs, and existing best practice guidance for the diagnosis of PE in pregnancy. REVIEW

findingsThe revised Geneva score and the pregnancy-adapted YEARS algorithm are promising risk stratification methods that have been found to be safe and effective to support the diagnosis of PE in pregnancy. CT pulmonary angiography and ventilation perfusion scans have comparable safety and effectiveness profiles. Iodinated contrast agents administered for CT pulmonary angiography in pregnant patients with suspected PE are not associated with risks of neonatal adverse events. Pregnant patients may experience distress about fetal health during diagnostic testing, underscoring the importance of counseling to help in decision-making and improve the quality of care. Recent guidelines have supported the use of clinical prediction rules. Both imaging modalities are considered safe in pregnancy, with some guidance advising to choose between the 2 tests based on chest radiography results. SUMMARY: The choice of diagnostic testing should be based on equipment availability, the ability to perform testing in a timely manner, clinical urgency, chest radiography results, and suspicion of alternative diagnoses.

Indexed as

Pregnancy Complications, CardiovascularPulmonary EmbolismComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHumansPregnancyRisk AssessmentVentilation-Perfusion ScanCT pulmonary angiographyimagingpregnancypulmonary embolismsevere maternal morbidityvenous thromboembolismventilation-perfusion scintigraphy

Identifiers

PMID40404047
PMCPMC12597582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.