ReviewChest2025
Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism During Pregnancy.
Review in Chest, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk Stratification in Pulmonary Embolism: Prognostic Value of PESI, WELLS, PADUA, and IMPROVE Scores in Relation to Laboratory Markers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
topic importancePulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the leading causes of pregnancy-related deaths in high-income countries. Maternal mortality from PE has been attributed to delayed recognition and investigation. The diagnosis of PE may be challenging, as its early signs and symptoms may overlap with physiological changes of pregnancy. As such, promptly ruling out suspected PE using diagnostic testing is of paramount importance. This narrative review provides a contemporary overview of risk assessment tools, diagnostic modalities, counseling needs, and existing best practice guidance for the diagnosis of PE in pregnancy. REVIEW
findingsThe revised Geneva score and the pregnancy-adapted YEARS algorithm are promising risk stratification methods that have been found to be safe and effective to support the diagnosis of PE in pregnancy. CT pulmonary angiography and ventilation perfusion scans have comparable safety and effectiveness profiles. Iodinated contrast agents administered for CT pulmonary angiography in pregnant patients with suspected PE are not associated with risks of neonatal adverse events. Pregnant patients may experience distress about fetal health during diagnostic testing, underscoring the importance of counseling to help in decision-making and improve the quality of care. Recent guidelines have supported the use of clinical prediction rules. Both imaging modalities are considered safe in pregnancy, with some guidance advising to choose between the 2 tests based on chest radiography results. SUMMARY: The choice of diagnostic testing should be based on equipment availability, the ability to perform testing in a timely manner, clinical urgency, chest radiography results, and suspicion of alternative diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.