ReviewJapanese journal of clinical oncology2025
Therapeutic strategy for scirrhous type gastric cancer.
Review in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting claudins in cancer.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Immune, molecular and genetic profiles of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: Recent progress and future challenges.International journal of cancer · 2026Review
- Prognostic significance of fibroblast senescence and senescence-associated secretory phenotype factor expression in the tumor microenvironment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Oncology reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scirrhous-type gastric cancer (SGC) is a rare but well-recognized subset of resectable gastric cancer (GC), accounting for ⁓10% of cases. Despite its long history of clinical recognition dating back to the pre-1900s, SGC remains one of the most challenging GC subtypes to treat. Traditionally, SGC has been clinically defined as Borrmann type 4 GC, with histological classifications such as signet ring cell carcinoma or diffuse-type histology serving as alternative diagnostic criteria. Therapeutic advancements for SGC have largely focused on locally advanced or oligometastatic disease, yet no SGC-specific treatment has been established. The phase III JCOG0501 trial failed to demonstrate a survival benefit of neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin for Borrmann type 4 and large type 3 GC. Recent developments in biomarker-driven therapies may redefine SGC by molecular subtypes, with CLDN18.2-targeted therapy emerging as a potential option for some SGC cases. However, as the landscape of medical oncology evolves, SGC may not remain a distinct therapeutic entity. The focus should shift toward understanding the intrinsic biology of SGC. Treatment development for SGC is expected to continue advancing, becoming increasingly stratified based on molecular abnormalities while maintaining a commitment to addressing unmet needs, such as early-onset GC and GC with symptomatic peritoneal dissemination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.