Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40403421›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2025

Mitigating catastrophic forgetting in Multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation using elastic weight consolidation.

Luisana Álvarez, Sergi Valverde, Àlex Rovira, Xavier Lladó

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luisana ÁlvarezVicorob Institute, University of Girona, Girona, Spain; Tensor Medical, Girona, Spain. Electronic address: lalvarez@tensormedical.ai.
Sergi ValverdeTensor Medical, Girona, Spain.
Àlex RoviraSection of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology (IDI), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Spain, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier LladóVicorob Institute, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion segmentation is crucial for monitoring disease progression. Deep learning methods have shown promising results but suffer from domain shift problems when evaluated in data from different protocols or scanners. Transfer learning (TL) achieves successful domain adaptation, but can lead to catastrophic forgetting, resulting in a significant performance drop on the source domain. Continuous learning aims to address this issue by retaining knowledge from previous domains while adapting to new ones. This work applies Elastic Weight Consolidation (EWC) for the first time in the context of domain-incremental learning for MS lesion segmentation. The approach was evaluated using a 3D U-Net trained on public datasets (WMH2017 and Shifts) and fine-tuned on an in-house dataset using both TL and EWC, in both full training and few-shot scenarios. Results show that with only 3 training images from the target domain, EWC leads to a 10% improvement in F-score, while using 5 images achieves similar results to using all available training images. Catastrophic forgetting was reduced by 8%-19% compared to standard TL, where performance drops ranged from 20 to 37%. This work demonstrates that EWC enables models to adapt to new domains while preserving previous knowledge, with minimal data requirements, advancing towards more generalizable deep learning models for clinical MS applications.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMultiple SclerosisFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleCatastrophic forgettingContinuous learningLesion segmentationMultiple sclerosisTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID40403421
PMCPMC12148725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.