ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2025
Mitigating catastrophic forgetting in Multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation using elastic weight consolidation.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion segmentation is crucial for monitoring disease progression. Deep learning methods have shown promising results but suffer from domain shift problems when evaluated in data from different protocols or scanners. Transfer learning (TL) achieves successful domain adaptation, but can lead to catastrophic forgetting, resulting in a significant performance drop on the source domain. Continuous learning aims to address this issue by retaining knowledge from previous domains while adapting to new ones. This work applies Elastic Weight Consolidation (EWC) for the first time in the context of domain-incremental learning for MS lesion segmentation. The approach was evaluated using a 3D U-Net trained on public datasets (WMH2017 and Shifts) and fine-tuned on an in-house dataset using both TL and EWC, in both full training and few-shot scenarios. Results show that with only 3 training images from the target domain, EWC leads to a 10% improvement in F-score, while using 5 images achieves similar results to using all available training images. Catastrophic forgetting was reduced by 8%-19% compared to standard TL, where performance drops ranged from 20 to 37%. This work demonstrates that EWC enables models to adapt to new domains while preserving previous knowledge, with minimal data requirements, advancing towards more generalizable deep learning models for clinical MS applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.