ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2025
Deriving risk-adapted starting ages of breast cancer screening according to polygenic risk score.
Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer screening starting at age 50 has been implemented in many countries. A recent recommendation of the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends lowering the starting age of breast cancer screening to 40. We aimed to assess the potential use of a polygenic risk score (PRS) for defining risk-adapted starting ages for women in the United States and various European countries as an alternative to population-wide lowering of the starting age.
methodsWe determined 5-year cumulative risks of breast cancer for women at individual ages between 30 and 50 years in the United States and 4 large European countries (Germany, the UK, Italy, and France) based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and GLOBOCAN 2022 database. Using relative risks for women within certain percentile ranges of a well-established PRS based on 313 risk variants (PRS313), we determined at which ages women with higher PRS313 would reach the breast cancer risk at age 50 of those at "medium" (40th to 60th percentile) risk.
resultsNon-Hispanic White women in the United States in PRS313 percentile categories 60-80, 80-90, 90-95, 95-99, and >99 would reach the medium 5-year cumulative risk at age 50 already at ages 43, 41, 39, 37, and 34, respectively. Despite some variation in breast cancer incidence, risk-adapted starting ages of screening were similar across European countries.
conclusionConsideration of a PRS would lead to risk-adapted starting ages of screening for breast cancer rather than a uniform advancement of starting age for White women in the United States and European countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.