ArticleAmerican journal of public health2025
Advancing a Measure of Sexual and Reproductive Well-Being Aligned With Core Values of Reproductive Justice and Human Rights.
Article in American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contraceptive use and unfulfilled preferences among women ages 15-49 years in the United States, 2022-2023.F&S reports · 2026Article
- Measurement of Human Flourishing Constructs in Evaluation of Voluntary Family Planning Interventions: A Modified Scoping Review of the Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Examining pathways by which socioeconomic instability in adolescence influence sexual health during emerging adulthood in an agricultural setting in California.American journal of community psychology · 2026Article
- Reimagining sexual health: gender, environment, and the pursuit of equity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Feminine hygiene products and black women's reproductive health: a review of health inequities, racialized marketing, and practice implications.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- What About Well-Being? Measuring What We Really Care About in Sexual and Reproductive Health.Studies in family planning · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexuality and reproduction are central to people's life experiences and their ability to thrive. Existing frameworks and measurements related to sexuality and reproduction are predominantly focused on the presence or absence of adverse outcomes, neglecting the critical question of whether people experience positive outcomes and have the sexual and reproductive lives they wish to have. The increased attention to well-being in economic, political, and health spheres presents an opportunity to define and measure the holistic construct of sexual and reproductive well-being. To this end, we engaged in an 18-month collaborative process to develop a definition of sexual and reproductive well-being, with the ultimate goal of informing the development of a measure that would be self-reported and assessed at the population level. The resulting draft definition and measure development approach will serve as the foundation for subsequent measure development. This values-driven process of defining sexual and reproductive well-being will contribute to developing a reproductive justice- and human rights-aligned measure that can illuminate the extent to which structures and systems enable optimal sexual and reproductive experiences. (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.