ArticleJCO precision oncology2025
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of tumor protein p53 expression levels in different stages of breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrating genomic mutations and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes improves prediction of response to trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2025Article
- Tumor Mutational Landscape and Its Correlation With Histopathological Characteristics in Breast Cancer.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBreast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease with genetic alterations influencing prognosis and treatment response.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study integrated clinical and genomic data from 4,265 patients with BC from the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (n = 2,509) and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (n = 1,756). Genetic profiling identified
resultsIn 3,807 patients with available gene alteration status,
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.