Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40403095›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2025

A pilot randomized controlled trial examining the feasibility of perioperative rehabilitation for inguinal hernia repair surgery.

Anna Shologan, Omar Farooq, Geoffrey Bostick, Luciana Macedo, Quentin Durand-Moreau, Meaghan Ray Peters, Douglas P Gross

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05069142 nacompletednot on this map

A Study Evaluating the Feasibility of a Peri-Operative Rehabilitation Program for Inguinal Hernia Repair Surgery to Reduce Risk of Post-Surgical Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled31ConditionsInguinal HerniaArmsRehabilitation
NCT07680777 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Perioperative Rehabilitation for Individuals Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled98ConditionsInguinal HerniaArmsRehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna ShologanFaculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6866-5673
Omar FarooqDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Geoffrey BostickFaculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Luciana MacedoSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Quentin Durand-MoreauDivision of Preventive Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Meaghan Ray PetersFaculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4864-3294
Douglas P GrossFaculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2427-6277

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the high frequency of inguinal hernia repair (IHR) surgery, there is little research investigating pre- or post-operative exercise and education in this population. Recommendations regarding perioperative physical activity are inconsistent and largely based on clinical opinion. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to examine the feasibility of perioperative rehabilitation for inguinal hernia repair surgery in terms of recruitment rate, assessment, and protocol implementation.

methodsParticipants were randomized into an intervention group and control group. Descriptive and patient-reported data were collected through online surveys at baseline, post-prehabilitation (prehab), 1-week post-operative (post-op), and 12-week post-op. Eligible participants completed a performance-based modified Short Form Functional Capacity Evaluation conducted by a masked observer at baseline, after 6 weeks of exercise and/or education, and at 12-week post-op. Participants in the intervention group received 6 weeks of exercise and education prior to and then after surgery. The control group received care as usual.

resultsThirty-one participants awaiting IHR with a mean age of 49 years were recruited (recruitment rate of 51.7%). Thirty participants were randomized into control (n = 16) and intervention groups (n = 14), while 1 dropped out prior to beginning the study due to being unable to take time off work for assessment. Twenty-four participants completed the final 12-week post-op follow-ups. Twenty-one participants returned to work by the 12-week post-op follow-up. Sixty-seven percent of participants in the intervention group exercised at least 3 times per week post-operatively. One participant in each group experienced exacerbations of hernia symptoms that were unrelated to study activities. Functional testing resulted in minimal symptom exacerbation in either group, but the intervention group reported less pain at 12-week post-op than controls.

conclusionA randomized trial of perioperative rehabilitation for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair appears feasible, but protocol adjustments are needed to improve recruitment rate, assessment, and participant retention. Trial Registration: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05069142.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyPerioperative CareAdultAgedExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID40403095
PMCPMC12097709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.