Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40403089›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Strategies to assess and promote the socio-emotional competencies of university students in the socio-educational and healthcare fields: A scoping review.

Natalia Gandía-Carbonell, Cristian Molla-Esparza, Sònia Lorente, Paz Viguer, Josep-Maria Losilla

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07407413 (The Edu), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07407413 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Edu:Social Health Care Project: Investigating the Effects of an Online Socio-emotional Dyad Intervention on Healthcare Students' Mental Health, Resilience, Social Competencies and Behaviors

TypeinterventionalSponsorMax Planck Social Neuroscience LabRan2026 to 2026Enrolled360ConditionsIntervention Condition, Control (Delayed Training) ConditionArmsExperimental: Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training (EmCo), Waitlist Control Group (WCG)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalia Gandía-CarbonellDepartment of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain‌.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6936-5372
Cristian Molla-EsparzaDepartment of Research Methods and Diagnostics in Education, Faculty of Philosophy and Education Sciences, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0783-617X
Sònia LorenteDepartment of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain‌.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5494-3325
Paz ViguerDepartment of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5174-7989
Josep-Maria LosillaDepartment of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain‌.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-5847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review systematically analyses and synthesises empirical evidence on measures and intervention programmes aimed at promoting socio-emotional competencies (SECs) in university students in socio-educational and healthcare fields. A comprehensive literature search was conducted of the Scopus, PubMed, ERIC and PsycINFO databases, and a narrative synthesis approach was employed to analyse the findings from a total of 288 studies. The results highlight a general consensus on the importance of fostering SECs in university students in both fields, while revealing a significant lack of research in the socio-educational sector. Regarding both populations, a notable heterogeneity was found in the measurement of SECs and in the wide variety of tools used, which were based on different theoretical approaches, and were often not standardised or not exclusively designed to measure this type of competencies. In the intervention programmes reviewed, the SECs most frequently promoted were empathy and interpersonal emotional perception, communication, and identification, understanding, and regulation of one's own emotions. Nonetheless, many studies lacked detailed reporting on the theoretical frameworks and intervention procedures applied, therefore limiting their replicability. Future intervention programmes should align targeted competencies with students' profiles, future roles and professional needs, using standardised, profile-adapted measures to better evaluate their effectiveness.

Indexed as

EmotionsStudentsEmpathyHumansUniversities

Identifiers

PMID40403089
PMCPMC12097715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.