ArticlePloS one2025
The structure of spontaneous speech changes in Alzheimer's disease: Crosslingual evidence from English and Greek.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surprisal from Large Language Models as an individual difference: Capturing the individual regardless of the text answer.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Cross-Lingual Alzheimer's Disease Speech Detection: Polarity Inversion and Few-Shot Calibration Strategies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Combining Linguistic, Behavioral and Visuospatial Measures to Characterize Multidomain Impairment in Dementia.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Correction: The structure of spontaneous speech changes in Alzheimer's disease: Crosslingual evidence from English and Greek.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Impairment in the semantic domain is prominent in Alzheimer's Disease (AD). We analyzed spontaneous speech in English from 148 people with probable AD (pAD) and 143 controls, and aimed to replicate these findings in a smaller Greek dataset of 28 controls and 26 pAD patients, using different language models comparatively. Static models (fastText) represented non-contextual meaning via encoding words as static vectors, while contextual models (BERT) represented the contextual meanings sensitive to syntactic structure. These models calculated semantic similarity at two levels: local similarity (between adjacent words/tokens) and global similarity (across all word/token pairs). Generative contextual models (Mistral) additionally quantified token probability within context, thereby indicating the unexpectedness in speech progression. Given that contextual meaning is syntactically sensitive, we introduced averaged dependency distance as an indicator for formal syntactic complexity. Moreover, bimodal models were introduced to evaluate how speech reflected picture-based stimuli. Results showed significant increases in global semantic similarity in the pAD group, as measured by both fastText and BERT models, which co-occurred with enlarged picture-speech semantic distance and increased in speech perplexity. Only the fastText-based global semantic similarity, which captured the contraction in conceptual semantic space, correlated with the overall cognitive decline in the AD populations. These findings together indicates that semantic space changes in AD differed across different forms of meanings and thus points to the necessity of distinguishing these forms to raveling the underlying mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.