Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40402974›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Expectation generation and its effect on subsequent pain and visual perception.

Rotem Botvinik-Nezer, Stephan Geuter, Martin A Lindquist, Tor D Wager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Social information creates self-fulfilling prophecies in judgments of pain, vicarious pain, and cognitive effort.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rotem Botvinik-NezerDepartment of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-2669-1877
Stephan GeuterDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Martin A LindquistDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Tor D WagerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1936-5574

Funding

Personalized spatiotemporal hemodynamic response models for functional magnetic resonance imagingR01MH129397 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Martin Lindquist, TOR D. WAGER · 2022 to 2026
$3.8M
The neural bases of placebo effects and their relation to regulatory processesR37MH076136 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI TOR D. WAGER · 2024 to 2026
$2.4M
Longitudinal Causal Inferencer for fMRIR01EB016061 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LINDQUIST, MARTIN · 2013 to 2020
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016061NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH129397NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH076136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian accounts of perception, such as predictive processing, suggest that perceptions integrate expectations and sensory experience, and thus assimilate to expected values. Furthermore, more precise expectations should have stronger influences on perception. We tested these hypotheses using a within-subject paradigm with social cues consisting of what participants were told were ratings from 10 prior participants, but which were actually constructed to independently manipulate the cue mean, variance (precision), and skewness independent of the actual stimulus intensity delivered. Forty-five participants reported their expectations regarding the painfulness of thermal stimuli or the visual contrast of flickering checkerboards. In a second session, similar (sham) cues were each followed by either a noxious thermal or a visual stimulus. Perceptions assimilated to cue-based expectations in both modalities, but precision effects were modality-specific: more precise cues enhanced assimilation in visual perception only, while higher uncertainty slightly increased reported pain. fMRI analysis revealed that the cues affected higher-level affective and cognitive systems--including assimilation to the cue mean in the Stimulus Intensity-Independent Pain Signature-1 (SIIPS-1), a neuromarker of endogenous pain processing--and in the nucleus accumbens. There were no predictive cue effects on the Neurological Pain Signature (NPS), a neuromarker of nociceptive pain. Region of interest analyses showed activity consistent with aversive prediction-error-like encoding in the periaqueductal gray during pain perception, but no cue or prediction error-related responses in early perceptual processing systems. Furthermore, behavioral and computational models of the expectation session revealed that expectations construction was biased towards extreme cue values in both modalities, and towards low-pain cues specifically. These findings suggest that predictive processing theories should be extended with mechanisms such as selective attention to outliers, and that expectation generation and its perceptual effects vary by sensory modality and primarily influence higher-level processes rather than early perception, at least when cues are not reinforced.

Indexed as

PainPain PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultBayes TheoremComputational BiologyCuesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40402974
PMCPMC12136418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.