Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40402959›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Structure of nods in conversation.

Taiga Mori, Yasuharu Den, Kristiina Jokinen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taiga MoriArtificial Intelligence Research Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6993-5726
Yasuharu DenGraduate School of Humanities, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Kristiina JokinenArtificial Intelligence Research Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head nods are a commonly observed gesture in daily conversations and has attracted the interest of many researchers in human, social, and computer sciences since early studies. However, there has been little research focusing on the structure of nod movement, which sometimes involve repetition of upward and downward movements. In this study, we shed light on this structure of nods which has been previously overlooked. Prior to the analysis, we propose systematic conceptualization of nod movement. First, we define a cycle as a consecutive upward and downward movement as the basic unit of analysis. We next define the number of cycles within a nod as its length and the relative position of a cycle within a nod as its position. We then define the magnitude as the difference between the lowest and highest points of the head within a cycle. In the analysis, we demonstrate that this magnitude varies depending on length and position, thereby providing evidence that nods exhibit a structured pattern. Specifically, three structural patterns were observed: (1) the magnitude of the first cycles increases with length (anticipatory rising), (2) the magnitude decreases proportionally with position (declination), and (3) the magnitude of the final cycles is noticeably smaller than predicted from the preceding trend (final lowering). Finally, we discuss the similarities between the discovered structure and the phonological structure of utterances, suggesting that these structures may represent a universal characteristic of human repetitive actions.

Indexed as

CommunicationGesturesAdultFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID40402959
PMCPMC12097566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.