ArticlePloS one2025
Structure of nods in conversation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Head nods are a commonly observed gesture in daily conversations and has attracted the interest of many researchers in human, social, and computer sciences since early studies. However, there has been little research focusing on the structure of nod movement, which sometimes involve repetition of upward and downward movements. In this study, we shed light on this structure of nods which has been previously overlooked. Prior to the analysis, we propose systematic conceptualization of nod movement. First, we define a cycle as a consecutive upward and downward movement as the basic unit of analysis. We next define the number of cycles within a nod as its length and the relative position of a cycle within a nod as its position. We then define the magnitude as the difference between the lowest and highest points of the head within a cycle. In the analysis, we demonstrate that this magnitude varies depending on length and position, thereby providing evidence that nods exhibit a structured pattern. Specifically, three structural patterns were observed: (1) the magnitude of the first cycles increases with length (anticipatory rising), (2) the magnitude decreases proportionally with position (declination), and (3) the magnitude of the final cycles is noticeably smaller than predicted from the preceding trend (final lowering). Finally, we discuss the similarities between the discovered structure and the phonological structure of utterances, suggesting that these structures may represent a universal characteristic of human repetitive actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.