ArticlePloS one2025
Postoperative human motion evaluation in orthopedics based on kinematic constraints and improved IMU-generated data processing algorithm.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Advances and Challenges of Textile-Based Triboelectric Nanogenerators for Smart Healthcare and Sports Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional methods for evaluating postoperative human motion in orthopedics suffer from high equipment costs, time-consuming detection processes, and can only provide static two-dimensional image information. To improve the efficiency and accuracy of postoperative human motion assessment in orthopedics, this study proposes an improved algorithm on the basis of kinematic constraints and inertial measurement units for postoperative human motion assessment in orthopedics. Compared with other methods, the average error and standard deviation of measuring human joint range of motion after orthopedic surgery based on inertial measurement units were the smallest. The average error and standard deviation of measuring human wrist joint range of motion were 1.23° and 1.63°, respectively. The efficiency and accuracy of measuring human joint range of motion after orthopedic surgery based on inertial measurement units were the highest. The efficiency and accuracy were 4s and 98%, respectively. The accuracy of calculating the human joint Angle after orthopedic surgery based on kinematic constraints is also better than other traditional algorithms. The method has high accuracy and applicability, which can effectively improve the monitoring efficiency of postoperative human motion assessment in orthopedics, reduce the error of postoperative human motion assessment in orthopedics, and effectively support personalized management and intervention, further providing reference for the optimization of postoperative human motion assessment in orthopedics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.