Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40402944›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Homonyms and context in signalling game with reinforcement learning.

Dorota Lipowska, Adam Lipowski, António L Ferreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dorota LipowskaFaculty of Modern Languages and Literature, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6268-7819
Adam LipowskiFaculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4198-6892
António L FerreiraDepartamento de Física, I3N, Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8696-3590

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using multi-agent signalling game with reinforcement learning, we examine the influence of context on the dynamics of homonyms. In our approach, context denotes additional information sent to the receiver, which helps to recognise the signal. Agents in our model select a communicated word or its interpretation with a probability proportional to the power of its weight, which accumulates over previous successful communication attempts (probability~weightα). The behaviour of the model hinges to some extent on whether this probability depends linearly ([Formula: see text]) or superlinearly ([Formula: see text]) on the weight. Numerical as well as analytical results show that contextuality stabilizes homonyms and also affects the overall dynamics of language formation. While in the linear regime, contextuality can hinder the formation of an efficient language, in the superlinear regime-it can even speed up the process. Some aspects of the evolution of homonyms in our model can be understood using a certain urn model. Mathematical analysis demonstrates that in the superlinear regime and in the presence of contextuality, the urn model predicts the existence of polarised-like homonyms, while in the linear regime, only symmetric homonyms can exist. Since there are polarised homonyms in natural languages, our work suggests that the superlinear regime (which could be considered as a manifestation of the so-called Metcalfe's law) may be more appropriate to describe language formation than the linear regime.

Indexed as

CommunicationGame TheoryLanguageLearningReinforcement, PsychologyHumansModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID40402944
PMCPMC12097563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.