Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40402943›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

An unfortunate natural experiment in learning how to provide services to those in need: The case of Ukrainian war refugees with disabilities in Warsaw and Bucharest.

Monika Nowicka, Alexandra Deliu, Bogdan Voicu, Magdalena Szarota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Monika NowickaInstitute of Sociology, Civitas University, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0430-8251
Alexandra DeliuInstitute of Sociology, Civitas University, Warsaw, Poland.
Bogdan VoicuInstitute of Sociology, Civitas University, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2221-2499
Magdalena SzarotaInstitute of Sociology, Civitas University, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When helping others, experience becomes important, especially in circumstances that involve interacting with different cultures-such as providing services to refugees. When disability is added to refugee status, multiple types of experience become necessary, with cross-sector collaboration serving as a valuable asset. Thus, in our approach, we do not consider the status of being a migrant and the status of being a person with disabilities separately, as that would be contrary to the lived experience of simultaneously being a refugee and person with disabilities. This paper explores the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on the capacity of the Polish and Romanian organizations providing services to Ukrainian refugees in Warsaw and Bucharest, with a particular focus on disabled refugees. Based on 41 interviews with service providers and grass-roots organizations, we find that this unfortunate event functioned as a natural laboratory for practicing, acquiring, and enhancing skills in multiple domains, leading to increased personal and institutional expertise. We examine the differences between Warsaw and Bucharest, with Warsaw having more experience in dealing with incoming flows of immigrants, while Bucharest is a relative newcomer in this respect. Additionally, we consider the distinction between public providers (public administration) and non-governmental organizations, observing the upscaling of the latter. Implications for policy are discussed within the framework of curtailing civic society under the illiberal wave.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesRefugeesHumansPolandRomaniaUkraineWarfare

Identifiers

PMID40402943
PMCPMC12097588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.