Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40402554›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2025

Statistical Relationship Between Wastewater Data and Case Notifications for COVID-19 Surveillance in the United States From 2020 to 2023: Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling Approach.

Masahiko Haraguchi, Fayette Klaassen, Ted Cohen, Joshua A Salomon, Nicolas A Menzies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Masahiko HaraguchiDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, United States, 1 6174321046.ORCID 0000-0002-3250-5746
Fayette KlaassenDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, United States, 1 6174321046.ORCID 0000-0002-9488-2571
Ted CohenDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases and Public Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8091-7198
Joshua A SalomonDepartment of Health Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3929-5515
Nicolas A MenziesDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, United States, 1 6174321046.ORCID 0000-0002-2571-016X

Funding

CDC HHS HHSD200201691779ICDC HHS NU38OT000297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, several US jurisdictions began to regularly report levels of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater as a proxy for SARS-CoV-2 incidence. Despite the promise of this approach for improving COVID-19 situational awareness, the degree to which wastewater surveillance data agree with other data has varied, and better evidence is needed to understand the situations in which wastewater surveillance data track closely with traditional surveillance data. Objective: In this study, we quantified the statistical relationship between wastewater data and traditional case-based surveillance data for multiple jurisdictions. Methods: We collated data on wastewater SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels and COVID-19 case reports from July 2020 to March 2023 for 107 counties representing a range in terms of geographic location, population size, and urbanicity. For these counties, we used Bayesian hierarchical regression modeling to estimate the statistical relationship between wastewater data and reported cases, allowing for variation in this relationship across counties. We compared different model structural approaches and assessed how the strength of the estimated relationships varied between settings and over time. Results: Our analyses revealed a strong positive relationship between wastewater data and COVID-19 cases for the majority of locations, with a median correlation coefficient between observed and predicted cases of 0.904 (IQR 0.823-0.943). In total, 23/107 counties (21.5%) had correlation coefficients below 0.8, and 3/107 (2.8%) had values below 0.6. Across locations, the COVID-19 case rate associated with a given level of wastewater SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentration declined over the study period. Counties with greater population size (P<.001) and higher levels of urbanicity (P<.001) had stronger concordance between wastewater data and COVID-19 cases. Measures of model fit, and relationships with urbanicity and population size, were robust to sensitivity analyses in which we varied the time period of analysis and the sample of counties used for model fitting. Conclusions: In a sample of 107 US counties, wastewater surveillance had a close relationship with COVID-19 cases reported for the majority of locations, with these relationships found to be stronger in counties with greater population size and urbanicity. In situations where routine COVID-19 surveillance data are less reliable, wastewater surveillance may be used to track local SARS-CoV-2 incidence trends.

Indexed as

COVID-19WastewaterBayes TheoremHumansSARS-CoV-2United StatesWastewaterBayesianBayesian modelingcoronavirusCOVID-19COVID-19 surveillanceemissionenvironmentenvironmental surveillancehierarchical modelinfectiouspandemicpulmonaryregression modelrespiratorySARS-CoV-2sewerseweragesurveillanceUnited States of AmericaUSAwastewaterwastewater epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID40402554
PMCPMC12121544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.