ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025
Dynamic machine learning models for predicting cesarean delivery risk in women with no prior cesarean delivery: A retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.
Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploratory Non-invasive Estimation of Cervical Dilation from Electrohysterography and Maternal Data: A Machine-Learning Proof-of-Concept Study.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Dynamic machine learning models for predicting cesarean delivery risk in women with no prior cesarean delivery: A retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate advanced machine learning (ML) models for predicting unplanned intrapartum cesarean deliveries in women with no previous cesarean delivery, using both static and dynamic clinical data.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using nationwide data from a large integrated healthcare provider, including 262 632 women whose labor had started. Two ML models, logistic regression and decision tree algorithms, were employed to predict unplanned cesarean delivery. The models incorporated demographic, medical, and obstetric variables collected at multiple time points during labor. Model performance was evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC).
resultsThe logistic regression model demonstrated an accuracy of 95% with an AUC-ROC of 0.92. The decision tree model showed adaptability in highly variable labor conditions, achieving an F1 score of 0.91 and excelling in real-time prediction. Key predictors included maternal age, gestational age, body mass index, fetal heart rate patterns, and labor dynamics. Model performance remained robust across various demographic subgroups but was slightly reduced in nulliparous women.
conclusionThese ML models provide an innovative approach to predicting unplanned cesarean delivery by integrating diverse clinical parameters, enhancing decision making, and optimizing labor management. Prospective validation and seamless integration into clinical workflows are required to establish their utility in broader obstetric practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.