Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40402533›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Dynamic machine learning models for predicting cesarean delivery risk in women with no prior cesarean delivery: A retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.

Ido Givon, Nati Bor, Ran Matot, Lior Friedrich, Daya Gross, Gili Konforty, Arriel Benis, Eran Hadar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dynamic machine learning models for predicting cesarean delivery risk in women with no prior cesarean delivery: A retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ido GivonHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4006-2950
Nati BorHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Ran MatotHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Lior FriedrichHolon Institute of Technology, Holon, Israel.
Daya GrossHolon Institute of Technology, Holon, Israel.
Gili KonfortyHolon Institute of Technology, Holon, Israel.
Arriel BenisHolon Institute of Technology, Holon, Israel.
Eran HadarHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and validate advanced machine learning (ML) models for predicting unplanned intrapartum cesarean deliveries in women with no previous cesarean delivery, using both static and dynamic clinical data.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using nationwide data from a large integrated healthcare provider, including 262 632 women whose labor had started. Two ML models, logistic regression and decision tree algorithms, were employed to predict unplanned cesarean delivery. The models incorporated demographic, medical, and obstetric variables collected at multiple time points during labor. Model performance was evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC).

resultsThe logistic regression model demonstrated an accuracy of 95% with an AUC-ROC of 0.92. The decision tree model showed adaptability in highly variable labor conditions, achieving an F1 score of 0.91 and excelling in real-time prediction. Key predictors included maternal age, gestational age, body mass index, fetal heart rate patterns, and labor dynamics. Model performance remained robust across various demographic subgroups but was slightly reduced in nulliparous women.

conclusionThese ML models provide an innovative approach to predicting unplanned cesarean delivery by integrating diverse clinical parameters, enhancing decision making, and optimizing labor management. Prospective validation and seamless integration into clinical workflows are required to establish their utility in broader obstetric practice.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionMachine LearningAdultDecision TreesFemaleHumansLabor, ObstetricLogistic ModelsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentROC CurveYoung Adultcesareandeliverymachine learningpredictionvaginal

Identifiers

PMID40402533
PMCPMC12553099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.