ArticleJAMA network open2025
Cardiac Events in Adults Hospitalized for Respiratory Syncytial Virus vs COVID-19 or Influenza.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of bivalent respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein-based vaccine in individuals with or without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: the DAN-RSV trial.European heart journal · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of Bivalent Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Vaccine for Older Adults in the Netherlands.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Modeling the Exposome in Murine Cardiovascular Disease.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2026Review
- An Appraisal of the Potential Downstream Benefits of RSV Vaccination in Older Adults.Reviews in medical virology · 2026Review
- In-hospital outcomes among patients admitted for myocardial infarction with coexisting respiratory syncytial virus versus influenza infections.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Respiratory syncytial virus infections and myocardial injury: the GEMINI Initiative.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Risk of Cardiorespiratory Events Following Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Related Hospitalization.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Severity of Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Other Respiratory Viruses Versus Seasonal Influenza Among Hospitalized Patients With Cancer.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Vaccination in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Case-Based Approach and Contemporary Review.CJC open · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Respiratory viral infections (RVIs) are associated with elevated cardiovascular risk; however, less is known about cardiac complications after hospitalization for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vs other vaccine-preventable RVIs (COVID-19 or influenza). Objective: To compare the risk of acute cardiovascular complications in adults hospitalized for RSV vs COVID-19 or influenza. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cross-sectional study, conducted before RSV vaccination rollout in Singapore, assessed all adults hospitalized for RSV or influenza (January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2024) and all adults hospitalized for COVID-19 during Omicron XBB/JN.1 transmission (January 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024). Exposure: Hospitalization for RSV, influenza (vaccinated or unvaccinated), or COVID-19 (boosted [≥3 vaccine doses] or unboosted [<3 vaccine doses]). Main Outcomes and Measures: Cardiovascular events during RSV, influenza, or COVID-19 hospitalization, defined as any cardiac, cerebrovascular, or thrombotic event, occurring from admission until discharge or death. Odds of any cardiovascular event (RSV vs COVID-19 or RSV vs influenza) and severe RVI (intensive care unit admission) with or without an acute cardiovascular event were estimated using multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Results: A total of 32 960 RVI hospitalizations (mean [SD] patient age, 66.58 [18.99] years; 17 056 [51.7%] female) were included (2148 for RSV, 14 389 for influenza, and 16 423 for COVID-19). Of the 2148 patients hospitalized for RSV, 234 (10.9%) had an acute cardiovascular event. Higher odds of any acute cardiovascular event (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.12-1.54) as well as other individual cardiac events were observed in RSV hospitalizations vs boosted COVID-19 (dysrhythmia: AOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.19-1.94; heart failure: AOR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.30-2.35). Similarly, higher odds of any acute cardiovascular event (AOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.24-2.01) as well as dysrhythmias or heart failure were observed in patients hospitalized for RSV vs unboosted COVID-19. Odds of a cardiovascular event were not significantly different in RSV vs influenza, except among contemporaneous hospitalizations after the pandemic (2023-2024), where odds of heart failure (AOR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.21-3.59) were significantly higher in RSV hospitalizations vs vaccine-breakthrough influenza hospitalizations. Occurrence of a cardiovascular event was associated with greater odds of severe RSV requiring intensive care unit admission (AOR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.21-4.62). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, 1 in 10 patients hospitalized for RSV had a concurrent acute cardiovascular event. Odds of cardiac events were significantly higher in RSV vs COVID-19 hospitalizations in both vaccine-boosted and unboosted individuals. In contemporaneous hospitalizations for RSV or influenza after the pandemic (2023-2024), odds of heart failure were significantly higher in RSV hospitalizations vs vaccine-breakthrough influenza hospitalizations. These findings suggest that patients with preexisting cardiovascular risk should consider vaccination against RVIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.