ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Estimating the Survival Impact of Curative-Intent Liver Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urban-Rural Disparities in Treatment and Outcomes for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the United States: A SEER-Medicare Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Improved Access, Improved Outcomes: Regional Increases of Curative-Intent Liver Therapies Are Associated with Improved Survival in Patients with CRCLM.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Survival of hepatectomy in colorectal cancer patients with ten or more liver metastases: a retrospective cohort study of multidisciplinary treatment.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM), curative-intent liver therapies are associated with improved survival. However, randomized data are lacking, and individual-level retrospective data are limited by selection bias. We aimed to quantify the survival impact of these therapies by analyzing how regional variation in liver therapy rates influence survival outcomes within health service areas (HSA). PATIENTS AND
methodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database (2000-2020) was analyzed for patients aged 66-85 years with liver-isolated CRCLM who underwent curative-intent liver therapy (i.e., hepatectomy, ablation, or transplantation). Rates of resection within HSAs for each year were calculated. A comparison of observed versus expected survival was performed between two eras (era 1: 2002-2004; era 2: 2013-2015) to quantify the impact of changing rates of curative-intent liver therapy on HSA-level survival.
resultsA total of 34,781 patients across 163 HSAs were included. Most patients had synchronous CRCLM (65.8%) and received chemotherapy (63.1%); a minority (10.9%) underwent curative-intent liver therapy (hepatectomy, 74.3%; ablation alone, 24.9%; transplantation 0.8%). A total of 56 (34%) HSAs had the rate of curative-intent liver therapy increase (≥ 5%) across eras, 58 (36%) HSAs had the rate remain constant, and 49 (30%) HSAs experienced a rate decrease (≥ 5%). Each 5% increase in the rate of curative-intent liver therapy was associated with a 1.2% (95% CI 0.4-2.0%) increase in the risk-adjusted survival rate (p = 0.003).
conclusionsHSA variation in rates of curative-intent therapy for CRCLM was associated with population-level changes in survival. These data quantify the expected improvements associated with efforts to increase patient access to curative-intent therapies for CRCLM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.