Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40402378›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2025

Shared Decision-Making for Restoring Trust in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the Post-pandemic Era.

Warren J Wexelman, Nicole Ciffone, Nishant P Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Warren J WexelmanMaimonides Medical Center, 4802 Tenth Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, USA. wexelmanmd@aol.com.
Nicole CiffoneArizona Center for Advanced Lipidology, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Nishant P ShahDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-world data indicate that the management of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is suboptimal in clinical practice and that many patients fail to reach guideline-recommended LDL-C goals. This may be due in part to physician inertia with regard to prescribing appropriate lipid-lowering therapies or poor adherence to such therapies in real-world practice. Shared decision-making is a collaborative process in which patients and healthcare professionals work together to develop treatment plans and management strategies that consider an individual's values and preferences, as well as clinical evidence. In this commentary, two preventive cardiologists and a nurse practitioner working in US practice discuss their real-world experiences of shared decision-making as well as key benefits such as helping to tackle the negative impacts of medical misinformation to restore patients' trust in healthcare professionals. Other potential benefits of shared decision-making include increased adherence to therapy and greater trust between patients and healthcare professionals. Finally, the authors discuss proposed solutions for potential barriers to the implementation of shared decision-making, including the support of a multidisciplinary team, the provision of learning materials from trustworthy sources, and tailoring of discussions to the individual patient.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesCOVID-19Decision Making, SharedPatient ParticipationTrustHumansPandemicsPhysician-Patient RelationsAtherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseCardiovascularLipid-lowering therapyShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID40402378
PMCPMC12182467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.