Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40402345›Full record

ReviewAnatomical science international2025

Traditions of Excellence: neuroanatomy at the forefront of the new era.

Kathleen S Rockland

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Anatomical science international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kathleen S RocklandDept. Anatomy & Neurobiology, Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, 72 East Concord St., Boston, MA, 02118, USA. krock@bu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6650-8785

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroanatomy is emerging from decades of neglect, where the synthetic approach, a neuroanatomical hallmark, was too often, as an aspersion, dismissed as "descriptive." The resurgence is in part driven by new technical advances (e.g., better visualization tools; larger sample sizes), many of which are briefly described here and treated in more detail elsewhere in this Special Issue. Another factor is the over-due recognition that a seemingly "descriptive" approach can be positively compatible with synthesis, integration, and conceptual formulation. The first two sections of this brief overview highlight advances in the level of microscopic visualization and the increasing availability of large data sets ("big data"). Illustrative examples of specific applications are drawn from the literature. A last section briefly discusses how neuroanatomy might be expected to develop further as the field continues to move forward.

Indexed as

NeuroanatomyBig DataHumansComplexityConnectomicsHeterogeneityHolisticMulti-scale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.