Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40402337›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2025

Activation patterns in male and female forebrain areas during habituation to food and context novelty.

Zoe R Irving, Eliza M Greiner, Mark Indriolo, Zhe Liu, Gorica D Petrovich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zoe R IrvingDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6453-602X
Eliza M GreinerDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6075-5216
Mark IndrioloDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.
Zhe LiuDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.
Gorica D PetrovichDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA. gorica.petrovich@bc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7008-3003

Funding

Forebrain Circuits and Control of Feeding Behavior by Learned CuesR01DK085721 · NIDDK · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI PETROVICH, GORICA D · 2010 to 2020
$3.4M
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases R01DK085721NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK085721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novelty has significant effects on feeding behavior. New foods and unfamiliar environments suppress consumption, and adaptation to novelty is fundamental to survival. Yet, little is known about habituation to eating in a novel environment. The aim of the current study was to determine if context familiarity impacts habituation to novel food and to identify underlying neural substrates. Adult male and female rats were tested for consumption of a novel, palatable food in a novel or familiar environment across four habituation sessions and a final test session. Test-induced Fos expression was measured in amygdalar, thalamic, prefrontal, and hippocampal regions known to be recruited during the first exposure to novelty. Rats in the novel context ate less compared to rats in the familiar context during each habituation session and test, and females ate less than males during the first session. Habituation to eating in the novel context robustly induced Fos in the majority of regions analyzed, including the central, basolateral, and basomedial nuclei of the amygdala, thalamic paraventricular and reuniens nuclei, and the hippocampal field CA1. Females had overall higher Fos induction in most regions analyzed and higher in the novel condition in the reuniens nucleus. Bivariate correlation analyses of Fos induction between regions found a large number of correlations in the novel context condition. Females tested in the novel context had uniquely large number of correlations between all regions analyzed, except for one thalamic subregion. These results suggest that novelty from context remains relevant late in habituation and recruits a distinct and more interactive network in females than in males.

Indexed as

Exploratory BehaviorFeeding BehaviorHabituation, PsychophysiologicProsencephalonSex CharacteristicsAmygdalaAnimalsEatingFemaleMaleProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosRatsRats, Long-EvansRats, Sprague-DawleyRecognition, PsychologyProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosConsumptionContextFosHabituationNoveltySex differences

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.