ArticleBrain structure & function2025
Activation patterns in male and female forebrain areas during habituation to food and context novelty.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Novelty has significant effects on feeding behavior. New foods and unfamiliar environments suppress consumption, and adaptation to novelty is fundamental to survival. Yet, little is known about habituation to eating in a novel environment. The aim of the current study was to determine if context familiarity impacts habituation to novel food and to identify underlying neural substrates. Adult male and female rats were tested for consumption of a novel, palatable food in a novel or familiar environment across four habituation sessions and a final test session. Test-induced Fos expression was measured in amygdalar, thalamic, prefrontal, and hippocampal regions known to be recruited during the first exposure to novelty. Rats in the novel context ate less compared to rats in the familiar context during each habituation session and test, and females ate less than males during the first session. Habituation to eating in the novel context robustly induced Fos in the majority of regions analyzed, including the central, basolateral, and basomedial nuclei of the amygdala, thalamic paraventricular and reuniens nuclei, and the hippocampal field CA1. Females had overall higher Fos induction in most regions analyzed and higher in the novel condition in the reuniens nucleus. Bivariate correlation analyses of Fos induction between regions found a large number of correlations in the novel context condition. Females tested in the novel context had uniquely large number of correlations between all regions analyzed, except for one thalamic subregion. These results suggest that novelty from context remains relevant late in habituation and recruits a distinct and more interactive network in females than in males.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40402337What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.