ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
A cross-sectional study on the use of complementary and alternative medicine in insomnia patients referred to psychiatric clinics in Iran.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of complementary and integrative medicine for mental disorders-a cross-sectional study in Germany.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the prevalence and types of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) utilization among Iranian patients referred to psychiatric clinics with self-reported insomnia. It also sought to explore demographic characteristics, attitude of the patients to CAM, the factors influencing patients' decision to use CAM, and factors thought to be linked to the adoption of CAM in this patient population.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted between July 2023 and October 2023 on 217 patients at outpatient academic psychiatric clinics affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Data was collected using the Persian version of the international questionnaire to measure use of complementary and alternative medicine (I-CAM-IR), assessing CAM usage, motives, specific modalities, and sources of exposure. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze demographic characteristics, while Chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations between demographic factors and CAM usage.
resultsA total of 217 patients were initially recruited for the study; however, 12 participants were excluded due to incomplete or invalid data, resulting in a final sample of 205 participants included in the analysis. Of 205 participants, 68.3% reported CAM use, with herbal medicines (73.6%), Persian medicine (45.7%), vitamins and minerals (43.6%), and cupping (10.7%) being prominent modalities. Significant associations were observed between CAM use and demographic factors such as age (P = 0.006), gender (P < 0.001), education (P = 0.006), occupation (P = 0.002), father and mother education levels (P < 0.001, P = 0.015), and family income (P = 0.019). Most CAM users (78.1%) did not inform healthcare providers about their CAM use, with perceived effectiveness mainly focused on health promotion (80.6%).
conclusionThis study reveals a substantial prevalence of CAM utilization among insomnia patients in psychiatric clinics of Iran, with demographic factors influencing CAM use. Healthcare providers should consider incorporating discussions about CAM into insomnia management strategies and be prepared to address patient preferences for complementary treatments. Future research should further explore the impact and outcomes of CAM utilization in managing insomnia to optimize patient care in psychiatric settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40402334What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.