ArticleMicrobial ecology2025
Oomycete Diversity and Ecology in Declining Alder Stands in Switzerland.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we assessed the occurrence and diversity of four oomycete genera (Phytophthora, Phytopythium, Pythium, and Globisporangium) in 13 declining alder (Alnus glutinosa and A. incana) stands in Switzerland. For this, we sampled and analyzed soil from tree rhizosphere, water from streams and rivers along which the stands were located, and symptomatic alder bark. The overall isolation rate was 47.2%, with a total of 400 oomycete isolates recovered at all 13 sites. The highest incidence of oomycete isolates was in soil samples (baiting, 82.5% isolation rate), followed by water (baiting, 14.7%), and bark (direct isolation, 2.7%). Of all recovered oomycete isolates, 90.3% could be successfully assigned to a known species, for a total of 23 species identified, including both preferential saprotrophs and pathogens. Among all genera, Phytophthora was the most abundant with 273 isolates (75.6%), followed by Phytopythium, Pythium, and Globisporangium. Oomycete species diversity showed a significant variation among substrates. Only one species-Phytophthora lacustris-was abundant in all substrates, while 16 species were restricted to a specific substrate, mainly soil. The rhizosphere of symptomatic alder trees harbored the most diverse oomycete community, highlighting once again the importance of soil as a reservoir for these microorganisms. Only two Phytophthora species were isolated from alder bark lesions, namely, P. × alni, the known causal agent of alder decline, and P. lacustris. The low recovery rate of P. × alni might be due to attempts to isolate it from old, inactive lesions, but may also suggest that alder decline might be caused by other oomycetes infecting the root system of the trees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.