ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
An X-ray bone age assessment method for hands and wrists of adolescents in Western China based on feature fusion deep learning models.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adult Age Threshold Estimation Using Radiographic Evaluation of Wrist-Hand Skeletal Maturation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The epiphyses of the hand and wrist serve as crucial indicators for assessing skeletal maturity in adolescents. This study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL) model for bone age (BA) assessment using hand and wrist X-ray images, addressing the challenge of classifying BA in adolescents. The results of this DL-based classification were then compared and analyzed with those obtained from manual assessment. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 688 hand and wrist X-ray images of adolescents aged 11.00-23.99 years from western China, which were randomly divided into training set, validation set and test set. The BA assessment results were initially analyzed and compared using four DL network models: InceptionV3, InceptionV3 + SE + Sex, InceptionV3 + Bilinear and InceptionV3 + Bilinear. + SE + Sex, to identify the DL model with the best classification performance. Subsequently, the results of the top-performing model were compared with those of manual classification. The study findings revealed that the InceptionV3 + Bilinear + SE + Sex model exhibited the best performance, achieving classification accuracies of 96.15% and 90.48% for the training and test set, respectively. Furthermore, based on the InceptionV3 + Bilinear + SE + Sex model, classification accuracies were calculated for four age groups (< 14.0 years, 14.0 years ≤ age < 16.0 years, 16.0 years ≤ age < 18.0 years, ≥ 18.0 years), with notable accuracies of 100% for the age groups 16.0 years ≤ age < 18.0 years and ≥ 18.0 years. The BA classification, utilizing the feature fusion DL network model, holds significant reference value for determining the age of criminal responsibility of adolescents, particularly at the critical legal age boundaries of 14.0, 16.0, and 18.0 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40402226What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.