ArticleClinical practice and cases in emergency medicine2025
Physician-Assisted Dying Witnessed by Emergency Medical Services: A Case Report.
Article in Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPhysician-assisted dying (PAD) is a practice that allows terminally ill patients to self-administer prescribed lethal medication. In the 11 states in the United States where PAD is legal, the incidence of PAD cases is rapidly rising. Despite most of these cases occurring in the out-of-hospital setting, states lack specific emergency medical services (EMS) protocols to guide prehospital responders who may encounter PAD in the field. We report a case in which a patient called 9-1-1 for a medical emergency and requested to ingest her prescribed lethal medication while in EMS care. CASE PRESENTATION: Emergency medical services was dispatched for a 56-year-old female bleeding from her tracheostomy stoma. Despite the EMS responders' recommendation, the patient refused transport and instead requested to ingest her PAD medication. The crew, unfamiliar with PAD laws, were unsure whether they could legally honor the patient's refusal. Clinicians consulted with online medical control, who were also unaware of PAD. After extensive deliberation, the crew decided to honor the patient's refusal and thoroughly document the situation. The patient self-administered her medication as EMS cleared the scene.
conclusionThis case highlights logistical challenges and ethical dilemmas faced by EMS responders and underscores the complexity of balancing patient autonomy with legal and medical responsibilities in prehospital situations involving PAD. As PAD becomes increasingly prevalent, equipping EMS responders with clear protocols and providing ongoing education about prehospital PAD cases are vital for preserving patient rights while protecting the responders from legal and ethical uncertainty.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.