ArticleClinical practice and cases in emergency medicine2025
Case Report: ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Third Trimester Pregnancy.
Article in Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhile rare in pregnancy, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) does happen. It has been found to be more common in individuals with risk factors. A case of chest pain in a previously healthy female in her third trimester demonstrates the importance of keeping ACS high on the differential list. CASE REPORT: A 26-year-old pregnant female gravida five, para three at 37 weeks gestation with a past medical history of diet-controlled gestational diabetes, obesity, and family history of myocardial infarction (MI) presented to an outside hospital for chest pain and was transferred to the closest ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) receiving emergency department (ED) after she was found to have an electrocardiogram (ECG) concerning for acute STEMI. On arrival to the ED, STEMI protocol was activated based on ST-segment elevations on inferior and antero-lateral leads on the ECG. Bedside assessment of the fetus by obstetrics showed a viable intrauterine pregnancy, and the patient was taken to the cardiac catheterization lab. She was found to have a 100% thrombotic occlusion in the ostium of the right posterolateral artery, and percutaneous coronary intervention was performed. The patient was discharged with plans for cesarean section at 39 weeks.
conclusionThis case highlights the need for early STEMI activation and consultation with obstetrics when a pregnant patient presents with an ECG suggestive of STEMI. It also emphasizes the importance of maintaining a high level of suspicion for STEMI in pregnant patients presenting with chest pain. Although rare-0.6 in 10,000 pregnancies-mortality rates range from 5.1-37% throughout pregnancy and postpartum. It is important to remember that pregnancy does not preclude a patient from undergoing standard treatment of acute MI.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.