Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40402037›Full record

SynthesisCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2025

Diagnostic Risk Prediction Models for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review.

Tyler Seyhan Saunders, Pawandeep Virpal, Maria Andreou, Asha Parmar, Christina Derksen, Oleg Blyuss, Fiona M Walter, Garth Funston

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tyler Seyhan SaundersCentre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0745-3067
Pawandeep VirpalCentre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-6731-3742
Maria AndreouCentre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0006-8634-9861
Asha ParmarCentre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0001-2423-5846
Christina DerksenCentre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4663-1882
Oleg BlyussCentre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0194-6389
Fiona M WalterCentre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7191-6476
Garth FunstonCentre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4156-6401

Funding

Barts Charity G-001522Cancer Research UK (CRUK) EDDPGM-May22\100002Invention for Innovation (i4i) NIHR207533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers are often detected late. Risk prediction models could facilitate earlier detection by identifying patients at risk for further investigation. We systematically reviewed evidence on UGI diagnostic risk prediction models. A search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was conducted for studies reporting on the development and/or validation of diagnostic risk prediction models for UGI cancers (pancreatic, gastric, esophageal, gallbladder, and/or biliary tract). Studies had to report at least one quantitative measure of model performance to be eligible for inclusion. A total of 82 studies describing 162 UGI risk models were included. Models predicted gallbladder (n = 6), gastric (n = 25), esophageal (n = 34), gastroesophageal (n = 14), and pancreatic (n = 83) cancers. Most models used logistic regression, but machine learning was increasingly used from 2019. In total, 366 unique variables were incorporated across models. Only 33 models were externally validated, with 15 achieving an AUC ≥0.80. This review highlights that several models perform well in predicting UGI cancers on external validation. Future research is needed to compare the best-performing models and assess their clinical utility, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness. Given the significant overlap in at-risk populations and predictors across UGI cancers, there may also be scope to develop UGI "multicancer" models.

Indexed as

Digestive System NeoplasmsModels, StatisticalHumansRisk AssessmentValidation Studies as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40402037
PMCPMC12314510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.