Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40402017›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2025

Self-report physical activity and sedentary behaviour assessments validated for Indigenous populations globally: a scoping review.

Melissa Kilburn, Yvonne Hornby-Turner, Valda Wallace, Dympna Leonard, Sarah G Russell, Rachel Quigley, Edward Strivens, Rebecca Evans

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melissa KilburnCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University Nguma-Bada Campus, Smithfield, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8712-2494
Yvonne Hornby-TurnerCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University Nguma-Bada Campus, Smithfield, Australia.
Valda WallaceCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University Nguma-Bada Campus, Smithfield, Australia.
Dympna LeonardAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Nguma-Bada Campus, Smithfield, Australia.
Sarah G RussellCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University Nguma-Bada Campus, Smithfield, Australia.
Rachel QuigleyCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University Nguma-Bada Campus, Smithfield, Australia.
Edward StrivensCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University Nguma-Bada Campus, Smithfield, Australia.
Rebecca EvansCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University Nguma-Bada Campus, Smithfield, Australia.

Funding

CSIROJames Cook University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic disease prevention programs that target physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are often evaluated using self-report assessment tools. However, these tools may require additional validation to ensure relevance and efficacy for Indigenous peoples. The scope to which this occurs is yet to be systematically assessed within the literature. This review aimed to explore and define the range of self-report physical activity and sedentary behaviour assessment tools validated for Indigenous adults globally. Searches were conducted across seven electronic databases; resultant articles were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two reviewers. Analysis of the 15 included articles suggests that self-report physical activity and sedentary behaviour assessment tools have achieved varying levels of validity amongst Indigenous populations globally. Most studies rated as low cultural appropriateness on a 14-item Indigenous research quality appraisal tool, however, there was a significant moderate upward trend over time (P = 0.0328). Digital physical activity or sedentary behaviour assessment tools have not yet been validated within Indigenous adult populations and constitute an apparent gap in the literature. Established validation methods for other populations were commonly found to be inappropriate for Indigenous population groups. There were no evident trends regarding validation study methodology identified, signifying a more bespoke approach within Indigenous population groups. Therefore, meaningful consultation and project co-design may help to prevent the potential methodological redundancy when developing and validating physical activity assessment methods within Indigenous populations globally.

Indexed as

ExercisePopulation GroupsSedentary BehaviorSelf ReportHumansIndigenous PeoplesReproducibility of ResultsassessmentIndigenous peoplesphysical activityreliability and validitysedentary behavioursurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40402017
PMCPMC12096453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.