ReviewEuropean stroke journal2025
Importance of blood pressure lowering in patients with direct oral anticoagulant-associated intracerebral haemorrhage in the acute phase and for secondary prevention.
Review in European stroke journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Agent-specific bleeding signatures in non-hypertensive versus hypertensive patients exposed to oral anticoagulants: a real-world pharmacovigilance study.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is an important complication of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy, where risks and prognosis are potentially modified by effective blood pressure (BP) control, both in the acute phase and for secondary prevention. Herein, we review BP management in the context of general anticoagulation associated ICH and specifically in DOAC-ICH, considering current evidence and highlighting outstanding questions.
methodNarrative review.
findingsPooled analyses of major trials of BP lowering in acute ICH patients without anticoagulants demonstrate a reduction in the risk of haematoma expansion. As anticoagulant-associated ICH patients tend to be older, have more co-morbidities, and larger haematomas at baseline with a greater risk of expansion, the risks and benefits of intensive BP lowering treatment might both be higher. Small observational studies of DOAC-ICH patients suggest that lower achieved BP is associated with less expansion, lower mortality, and better functional outcomes. Care bundles including both anticoagulant reversal and intensive BP lowering might reduce the risk of death and disability in DOAC-ICH. Optimal control of BP in survivors of ICH reduces the risk of both ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke but whether this modulates the risks and benefits of restarting a DOAC is unknown. DISCUSSION: Limited evidence suggests that BP should be well managed in DOAC-ICH patients, in the same way as ICH patients not on anticoagulants, both in the hyperacute phase and for secondary prevention. Hypothetical differences in the effects of BP lowering treatment in DOAC-ICH need to be tested in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.