ArticleNucleic acids research2025
m6A modification is incorporated into bacterial mRNA without specific functional benefit.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compendium of RNA modifications for bacterial stress adaptation.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2026Review
- Epitranscriptomics as a Candidate Universal Modulator of Dormancy Transitions.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Epitranscriptomic control of stress adaptations in Escherichia coli.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Posttranscriptional 3'-Terminal Modifications ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Enhanced detection of RNA modifications in Escherichia coli utilizing direct RNA sequencing.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
N 6-Methyladenosine (m6A), the most abundant modification in eukaryotic messenger RNAs (mRNAs), has also been found at a low level in bacterial mRNAs. However, enzyme(s) that introduce m6A modification on mRNAs in bacteria remain elusive. In this work, we combine deep-sequencing approaches that identify m6A sites with in vitro biochemical studies to identify putative m6A methyltransferases that would modify Escherichia coli mRNAs. We tested four uncharacterized candidates predicted to encode proteins with putative methyltransferase domains, whose deletion decreased the m6A level. However, in vitro analysis with the purified putative methyltransferases revealed that none of them installs m6A on mRNA. Exposure to heat and oxidative stress also changed the m6A level; however, we found no clear correlation between the m6A change and the specific stress. Considering two deep-sequencing approaches with different resolution, we found that m6A methylation on bacterial mRNAs is very low and appears randomly introduced. These results suggest that, in contrast to eukaryotes, the m6A modification in bacterial mRNA lacks a direct enzymatic recognition mechanism and has no clear biological function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.