Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40401497›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025

Analysis of the Current Status and Influencing Factors of Social Alienation in Adolescent Scoliosis Patients.

Yi Zeng, Qin Fu, Xia Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yi ZengSurgical Intensive Care Unit, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2175-7780
Qin FuThe Second Department of General Surgery, West China Shangjin Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xia LiSurgical Intensive Care Unit, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAdolescent scoliosis patients frequently experience social alienation, yet comprehensive studies addressing its determinants in China remain scarce. This study aims to understand the current status of social alienation in adolescent scoliosis patients and analyze its influencing factors to inform targeted interventions.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2022 to December 2023. A total of 252 adolescent scoliosis patients were investigated using the General Information Questionnaire, Social Alienation Scale, Family Care Scale, and Anxiety Self-Rating Scale. Multivariate linear regression analysis was employed to identify independent factors influencing social alienation.

resultsAdolescent patients with scoliosis experience significant social isolation (37.21 ± 0.78), lower levels of family care (6.33 ± 0.70), and higher anxiety self-assessment scores (53.11 ± 0.88), and the results showed that education level, per capita monthly family income, time of disease onset, type of scoliosis, Cobb's angle, ability to take care of oneself, appearance deformation, family care, and anxiety were found to independently influence the social alienation score (all p < 0.05).

conclusionAdolescent patients with scoliosis exhibit a heightened degree of social isolation due to a variety of factors. Healthcare professionals should focus on providing individualized interventions, particularly for those with lower levels of education and family support, to alleviate their social isolation.

Indexed as

ScoliosisSocial AlienationSocial IsolationAdolescentAnxietyChildChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnairesadolescentsinfluencing factorsscoliosissocial alienation

Identifiers

PMID40401497
PMCPMC12214396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.