ArticleBiotechnology progress
Minimizing batch-to-batch variability of a live virus vaccine by process analytical technologies.
Article in Biotechnology progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Minimizing batch-to-batch variability of a live virus vaccine by process analytical technologies.Biotechnology progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For bioprocesses producing live virus, such as enterovirus Coxsackievirus A21, viral titer (infectivity basis) decay rates can exceed 30% within a day. Consequently, harvest timing is paramount. To optimize titer at harvest, a continuous viral product titer model was generated to elucidate kinetics. The model leveraged experimentally determined viable cell density, cell-specific viral productivity, and viral specific decay rates. Next, three separate online process analytical technology (PAT) harvest triggers were developed to predict maximal viral titer. Finally, the PAT harvest triggers were tested alongside traditional time-based harvests. The harvest triggers utilized common bioprocessing tools - dissolved oxygen (DO) and capacitance probes - to track DO and viable cell volume (VCV) and derived a third parameter, cell-specific oxygen uptake rate. Harvesting with PAT triggers allowed for significantly improved batch-to-batch consistency. The standard deviation of harvest yield was reduced by 41% (DO), 56% (OUR) and 71% (capacitance) as compared to the industry standard time-based harvest. Even when a process deviation in inoculated cell density occurred, causing a significant shift in viral titer kinetics, the PAT harvest triggers yielded greater than 87% of peak titer. By comparison, the time-based harvest yielded 16%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.