ArticleHuman molecular genetics2025
Improving genetic diagnostic yield in familial and sporadic cerebral cavernous malformations: detection of copy number and deep Intronic variants.
Article in Human molecular genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformations: Pathophysiology, Genetics, Biomarkers, and Treatment Perspectives.Journal of neurochemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are intracranial vascular lesions associated with risk of haemorrhages and seizures. While the majority are sporadic and often associated with somatic variants in PIK3CA and MAP3K3, around 20% are familial with germline variants in one of three CCM genes-KRIT1/CCM1, CCM2 and PDCD10/CCM3. We performed comprehensive phenotyping and genetic analysis of nine multiplex families and ten sporadic individuals with CCM. In the familial cases, initial standard analyses had a low yield, we therefore searched for small copy number changes and deep intronic variants. Subsequently, pathogenic germline variants in KRIT1/CCM1 or CCM2 were identified in all 9 multiplex families. Single or multiple exon deletions or splice site variants in KRIT1/CCM1 were found in 3/9 families. Where cavernous malformation tissue was available, second hit somatic PIK3CA variants were identified in 4/7 individuals. These 4 individuals were from separate families with germline KRIT1/CCM1 variants. In 8/10 sporadic cases, we detected recurrent pathogenic somatic PIK3CA, MAP3K3 or CCM2 variants. All familial cases had multiple CCMs, whereas the sporadic cases had a single lesion only, which was in the temporal lobe in 9/10 individuals. Our comprehensive approach interrogating deep intronic variants combined with detection of small copy number variants warrants implementation in standard clinical genetic testing pipelines to increase diagnostic yield. We also build on the established second hit germline and somatic variant mechanism in some CCM lesions. Genetic diagnosis has clinical implications such as reproductive counselling and provides potential eligibility for precision medicine therapies to treat rapidly growing CCMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.