ArticleBioanalysis2025
Validated GC-MS methods to detect ethylene, diethylene, and triethylene glycol in serum, plasma, and urine samples.
Article in Bioanalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-throughput UPCAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile Polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG 3350) is approved by the USFDA for short term use by adults, it is commonly recommended for use in constipated children. Multiple reports of adverse events in children taking PEG 3350 raised safety concerns suggesting that low molecular weight species of PEG 3350 might be absorbed from the gut and cause side effects such as ethylene glycol (EG), diethylene glycol (DEG), and triethylene glycol (TEG). RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThis article documents the development, validation, and application of analytical methods using GC-MS and GC-MS/MS for the quantitation of EG, DEG, and TEG in human plasma, serum, and urine.
resultsThe analytical range for EG, DEG, and TEG was 2-20 µg/mL. The sample preparation process involves derivatization using N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide with 1% trimethylchlorosilane in each biological matrices. Deuterated internal standards for each of the analytes were included to provide accurate quantitation of the glycol analytes.
conclusionsThe validated methods were applied to analyze samples a pilot study of children taking PEG 3350. DEG and TEG were detected at levels below the limit of quantitation. In summary, a platform of analytical methods was developed to evaluate glycol analogs in urine, serum, and plasma clinical samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.