Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40401335›Full record

ArticleAutism : the international journal of research and practice2025

The impact of state policy on early autism diagnosis: A qualitative investigation.

Olivia J Lindly, Danielle Abate, Plyce L Fuchu, Jocelyn L Kuhn, Purnima S Mudnal Bharath, Sarah M Asantewaa, Emily Feinberg, Sarabeth Broder-Fingert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olivia J LindlyNorthern Arizona University, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0767-6321
Danielle AbateUniversity of Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9175-506X
Plyce L FuchuUniversity of Massachusetts, USA.
Jocelyn L KuhnEmory University, USA.
Purnima S Mudnal BharathUniversity of California Los Angeles, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0649-6321
Sarah M AsantewaaNorthern Arizona University, USA.
Emily FeinbergBrown University, USA.
Sarabeth Broder-FingertUniversity of Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

2/2-Testing the impact of early screening on the long-term outcomes of children with ASDR01MH121599 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BRODER-FINGERT, SARABETH · 2020 to 2023
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism diagnosis before age three to expedite access to critical services is a public health priority in the United States. Still, the average age of autism diagnosis is 49 months with substantial variability across states. By examining policy-defined as laws, regulations, procedures, administrative actions, incentives, or voluntary practices of governments or other institutions-modifiable structural drivers of early (or late) autism diagnosis may be identified. We, therefore, sought to identify policies impacting early autism diagnosis in five states that are part of a larger initiative to improve autism diagnosis (Arizona, California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania) and those that exist nationally. We conducted semi-structured interviews from 2021 to 2023 with a purposive sample of 57 autism policy or research experts. The following four themes were identified through conventional content analysis: (1) developmental monitoring is critical; however, developmental screening policies vary within and across states; (2) myriad policy and contextual factors shape early diagnosis pathways within states; (3) early intervention by the state and community-based early childhood programs influence early autism diagnosis; and (4) persistent disparities in early autism diagnosis pathways are affected by policies. Study findings highlight the importance of advancing certain state and federal policies to increase early autism diagnosis.Lay abstractIn the United States, when children on the spectrum are diagnosed before age three, it can help them get the services they need to thrive. There are many differences between states as far as how many children are diagnosed with autism and the average age when they are diagnosed. Some work suggests these differences may be due to state polices, which include the laws and processes governments and organizations follow. Little research has tried to understand the similarities and differences between state policies related to autism diagnosis. Because of this, our study looked at how state policies impact the timing of autism diagnosis in the United States. We interviewed 57 experts in five states and nationally from 2021 to 2023. Four key themes were identified including (1) developmental monitoring often leads to screening, but there is much variation in and across states; (2) family, community, and healthcare factors shape pathways to autism diagnosis in states; (3) early intervention and education programs play a role in autism diagnosis; and (4) systematic differences in access to diagnosis services persist for certain groups of children and families such as those with limited English-speaking abilities. This study's findings point to certain state and federal policy changes or enhancements to reduce the age of autism diagnosis and ameliorate persistent disparities in autism diagnosis.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderEarly DiagnosisHealth PolicyState GovernmentChild, PreschoolHumansQualitative ResearchUnited Statesautismdisparitiesearly diagnosisinsurancepolicyservicesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40401335
PMCPMC12263328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.