Trial reportSuicide & life-threatening behavior2025
THRIVE: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Social Validity of a Brief Recovery-Focused Intervention in Crisis Stabilization Centers.
Trial report in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05558891 (THRIVE), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
THRIVE: Pilot Study of a Brief, Recovery-focused Intervention for Crisis Stabilization Centers
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCrisis Stabilization Centers (CSCs) are a critical component of the crisis response system and the 988 Lifeline expansion that may promote ED diversion. To maximize CSC care quality and effectiveness, brief psychotherapy interventions that focus on recovery, match CSC workflows, and have the potency to reduce suicide attempts and deaths are needed but do not exist. The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and social validity of a novel, ultra-brief, 60-min psychotherapy intervention-Toward Hope, Recovery, Interpersonal Connection, Values, and Engagement for Crisis (THRIVE-C).
methodsWe recruited CSC stakeholders (n = 15) and CSC study therapists (n = 5) to complete surveys, followed by a pilot study of THRIVE-C with CSC guests (n = 54).
resultsCSC stakeholders, study therapists, and guests found THRIVE feasible, acceptable, appropriate, and socially valid. CSC guests experienced THRIVE-C as satisfactory, established a positive therapeutic alliance (bond), and 91% of guests endorsed behavioral intentions to attend outpatient psychotherapy appointments after discharge. Further, 94% of guests completed all phases of THRIVE, demonstrating clinical readiness to work on suicide recovery beyond physical safety or stabilization from suicide alone.
conclusionPreliminary findings suggest that further development and testing of THRIVE are needed.
trial registrationThis study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT05558891).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.