ArticleJournal of food science2025
Variations in Sensory and Emotional Responses to Gluten-Containing and Gluten-Free Cookie Products Under Blind and Labeled Conditions.
Article in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Color of Chocolate Chip Cookies: Comparative Performance of Instrumental Colorimetry, Digital Image Analysis, and Computer Vision Relative to Human Perception.Journal of food science · 2026Article
- Descriptive Sensory Analysis of Gluten-Containing and Gluten-Free Chocolate Chip Cookies Available in the Marketplace.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of sensory quality perceptions of gluten-free cookies evaluated by celiac and non-celiac people.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gluten-free food market is expanding rapidly. However, consumer acceptance and emotional responses to gluten-free food, especially commercially available products, have received relatively underexplored. This study aimed to determine how consumer perceptions, acceptance, and emotional responses differ between gluten-containing (C) and gluten-free (F) chocolate chip cookies from three brands under both blind and labeled conditions. In the labeled condition, 84 participants without celiac disease evaluated 3 F cookies labeled "gluten-free" and 3 C cookies presented without claims on a plain white card. In the blind condition, they tested the six cookies without labels. Participants provided hedonic ratings, Just-About-Right (JAR) ratings, and checked their emotional responses for each cookie. Results showed that participants liked the texture and overall aspects of the C cookies more than their F counterparts. Significant variations were observed in hedonic ratings of appearance, flavor, texture, and overall impression between C and F cookies, with brand playing a notable role. Although the gluten condition had a minimal effect on emotional responses to C and F cookies, this impact varied by brand. The influence of gluten-free labeling on sensory and emotional responses to C and F cookies was limited. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that sensory and emotional responses to gluten-containing versus gluten-free cookies can differ significantly across brands, and gluten-free claims had little impact on these responses. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Our study revealed that gluten-free cookies from some brands can rival their gluten-containing counterparts. However, there is still room for improvement in the sensory quality of gluten-free products, particularly regarding texture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.