ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
A study on the application and effect of ERAS-based refined nursing in patients undergoing radical lung cancer surgery.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of ERAS-based refined nursing on postoperative pain management in lung cancer surgery patients.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Effect of ERAS-guided refined nursing on early mobilization after lung cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) concept has gradually been applied in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of refined nursing based on the ERAS concept on clinical index, physiological index, and comprehensive health index of patients undergoing radical surgery for lung cancer. Method: This study included 120 patients who underwent radical surgery for lung cancer. All patients were divided into an observation group (receiving refined nursing based on ERAS concept) and a control group (receiving routine care). Analyze the differences in clinical index, physiological index, comprehensive health index, and patient satisfaction at discharge between two groups before and after intervention. Evaluate the independent impact of nursing methods on these indicators through multiple linear regression. The ROC curve is used to evaluate the performance of a multi factor linear regression model. Result: The observation group showed significant improvement in clinical index, physiological index, and comprehensive health index compared to the control group. In terms of complications, the incidence of pneumonia, pneumothorax and other complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group. The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that ERAS based refined nursing had significant independent effects on clinical index, physiological index, and comprehensive health index. The ROC curve shows that the AUC of the biochemical indicator model is the highest, followed by the comprehensive health indicator and clinical indicator models. Conclusion: The refined nursing based on ERAS concept significantly improves the clinical index, physiological index, and comprehensive health index of lung cancer radical surgery patients compared to conventional nursing, and has the best effect in physiological index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.