ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2025
Cardiovascular outcomes of chagas-induced non-ischemic cardiomyopathy versus other nonischemic cardiomyopathies: a regression matched national cohort analysis.
Article in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fulminant and fatalASM case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesChagas disease, caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, is a parasitic infection endemic to Latin America and is increasingly prevalent in the United States. This study examines mortality, heart failure, arrhythmias, cardiogenic shock, and the need for heart transplantation in Chagas patients over five years in the United States.
methodsWe selected all non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients from the National Inpatient Sample Database from 2016 to 2020 and compared them to Chagas-induced NICM.
resultsA total of 783,535 patients had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), with 250 cases being secondary to Chagas disease. Chagas NICM was predominantly seen in the Hispanic population. Patients with Chagas NICM have significantly higher odds of receiving a heart transplant (OR 15.48; P<0.05), particularly in the context of a high incidence of cardiogenic shock due to end-stage heart failure or severe myocarditis (OR 2.7; P<0.05). Furthermore, these patients demonstrate a higher incidence of ventricular fibrillation (OR 4.87; P<0.05) and pericardial effusion (OR 3.75; P<0.05) compared to other forms of NICM. They are frequently associated with the need for pacemaker placement (OR 2.80; P<0.05), likely due to ventricular fibrillation and conduction blocks. The odds of in-hospital mortality were similar between patients with Chagas NICM and those with other NICM patients.
conclusionPatients with Chagas cardiomyopathy are more likely to experience cardiogenic shock, ventricular fibrillation, and pericardial effusion. They also face an increased risk of needing an ICD and heart transplant. Further research is necessary on this subject.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.