ArticleEvolutionary applications2025
Vertical Cancer Transmission via Asexual Fragmentation and Associated Cancer Prevalence.
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fraternal cooperation of hierarchical cancer parallels metazoan multicellularity and eusociality.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While sexual reproduction is a general feature of animals, fissiparity and budding are relatively uncommon modes of asexual reproduction by which a fragment from a parent becomes an independent organism. Unlike unitary development, tumor cells can be included in the detached fragment destined to become offspring. Although fragmentation facilitates the vertical transmission of parental tumor cells to nascent progeny, this process requires significantly fewer cell replications than development from a zygote. The former is a risk factor for cancer, while the latter reduces oncogenic mutations during replication, indicating that two opposite effects of carcinogenesis are involved in fragmentation. If fragmentation can significantly reduce the number of cell replications for the development and a small portion of parental cancer is transmitted to the offspring during fragmentation, consecutive fragmentation across generations can gradually diminish the cancer risk of offspring, which I term fragmentational purging. On the other hand, consecutive fragmentation may aggravate the cancer risk of the progeny, a process of fragmentational accumulation. The model results imply that fragmentational purging does not necessarily guarantee the evolution of fragmentation, nor does fragmentational accumulation ensure its exclusion. Other relevant factors including juvenile susceptibility of sexual reproduction and loss of genetic diversity stemming from asexual reproduction can influence the selective advantage of fragmentation. Furthermore, owing to the common features of stemness and self-renewal, the existence of pluripotent adult stem cells required for fragmentation could be coupled with elevated cancer risk. The model results across diverse parameters and the associated mathematical analyses highlight multifaceted evolutionary trajectories toward fragmentation. Further investigation of cancer-suppression strategies that fragmentational animals employ could provide insights into regenerative medicine and cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.